6. Considering only the first growths, please rank 2001, 2004, 2007, 2008 and 2011 in terms of quality (first being the best).
1. 2001
2. 2008
3. 2011
4. 2004
5. 2007
The 2001 vintage was the clear winner here, with almost 60 per cent of respondents choosing it as their number one. The 2007 vintage was an equally clear loser, with 85 per cent of respondents putting it last. The battle between 2008, 2011 and 2004 was a much more equal fight, with 2008 eventually coming out on top.
http://www.liv-ex.com/staticPageContent....Key=Survey
(05-06-2012 09:42 AM)fleer schreef: [ -> ]6. Considering only the first growths, please rank 2001, 2004, 2007, 2008 and 2011 in terms of quality (first being the best).
1. 2001
2. 2008
3. 2011
4. 2004
5. 2007
The 2001 vintage was the clear winner here, with almost 60 per cent of respondents choosing it as their number one. The 2007 vintage was an equally clear loser, with 85 per cent of respondents putting it last. The battle between 2008, 2011 and 2004 was a much more equal fight, with 2008 eventually coming out on top.
http://www.liv-ex.com/staticPageContent....Key=Survey
Bedankt voor deze Link "fleer".
Ik las hierin dat "Leoville Poyferre 2011" zeer ontgoochelt. Deze wijn is nochtans een van mijn favorieten. Alle info over kwaliteit en prijsevolutie is van harte welkom.